Transaction isolation is one of the foundations of database transaction processing. Isolation is one of the four key properties of a transaction (commonly referred as ACID).
The SQL-92 standard defines four levels of transaction isolation: Read Uncommitted, Read Committed, Repeatable Read, and Serializable. See the following table for details:
|Isolation Level||Dirty Write||Dirty Read||Fuzzy Read||Phantom|
|READ UNCOMMITTED||Not Possible||Possible||Possible||Possible|
|READ COMMITTED||Not Possible||Not possible||Possible||Possible|
|REPEATABLE READ||Not Possible||Not possible||Not possible||Possible|
|SERIALIZABLE||Not Possible||Not possible||Not possible||Not possible|
TiDB implements Snapshot Isolation (SI) consistency, which it advertises as
REPEATABLE-READ for compatibility with MySQL. This differs from the ANSI Repeatable Read isolation level and the MySQL Repeatable Read level.
In the default configuration of TiDB v3.1, the automatic transaction retry is disabled. For how this feature influences the isolation level and how to enable it, see automatic retry.
TiDB uses the Percolator transaction model. A global read timestamp is obtained when the transaction is started, and a global commit timestamp is obtained when the transaction is committed. The execution order of transactions is confirmed based on the timestamps. To know more about the implementation of TiDB transaction model, see MVCC in TiKV.
The Repeatable Read isolation level only sees data committed before the transaction begins, and it never sees either uncommitted data or changes committed during transaction execution by concurrent transactions. However, the transaction statement does see the effects of previous updates executed within its own transaction, even though they are not yet committed.
For transactions running on different nodes, the start and commit order depends on the order that the timestamp is obtained from PD.
Transactions of the Repeatable Read isolation level cannot concurrently update a same row. When committing, if the transaction finds that the row has been updated by another transaction after it starts, then the transaction rolls back and retries automatically. For example:
create table t1(id int); insert into t1 values(0); start transaction; | start transaction; select * from t1; | select * from t1; update t1 set id=id+1; | update t1 set id=id+1; commit; | | commit; -- the transaction commit fails and rolls back
The Repeatable Read isolation level in TiDB differs from ANSI Repeatable Read isolation level, though they sharing the same name. According to the standard described in the A Critique of ANSI SQL Isolation Levels paper, TiDB implements the Snapshot Isolation level. This isolation level does not allow strict phantoms (A3) but allows broad phantoms (P3) and write skews. In contrast, the ANSI Repeatable Read isolation level allows phantom reads but does not allow write skews.
The Repeatable Read isolation level in TiDB differs from that in MySQL. The MySQL Repeatable Read isolation level does not check whether the current version is visible when updating, which means it can continue to update even if the row has been updated after the transaction starts. In contrast, if the row has been updated after the transaction starts, the TiDB transaction is rolled back and retried. Transaction Retries in TiDB might fail, leading to a final failure of the transaction, while in MySQL the updating transaction can be successful.
The MySQL Repeatable Read isolation level is not the snapshot isolation level. The consistency of MySQL Repeatable Read isolation level is weaker than both the snapshot isolation level and TiDB Repeatable Read isolation level.